Wednesday, 27 April 2011

Film Improvements

After we watched the first things we filmed, we used the iMovie programme to watch what we had done. We went over this with our teachers and were advised to change certain things. We also agreed with these points and made some of our own as we wanted our film to be at its highest standard. We had to reschedule this with the actors and get all of our props together. This was fine with the actors and as we were using our own locations, this was fine as well.

We went on to re-film certain parts, mostly the parts filmed in Bob Thurgood Phillips' (Bob Phillips) room as the lighting made the exposure and the reflections from the camera really odd and discoloured. The whole scene had a strong orange tint to it and made the shot look like everything was shining and reflecting light. This was because instead of using natural light we decided to use the electric, artificial lighting. As we were filming it wasn't apparent to us but when watching the clips we realised it was one of the worst filmed parts of our sequence. This is why we filmed it again one day after school. The actor was happy to do this as it only took up to an hour and he was happy to redo the scenes as we showed the previous clips and he also agreed we couldn't use them.

There was another scene in the sequence that we wanted to re-film but, the two times we tried to do it, it didn't work at all. The scene when Stacey is coming out of her front door was the worst shot we created throughout the whole piece. The shot was really over exposed and her costume really didn't help as she had a light pink t-shirt on and very light, blue jeans. When we filmed the first time we filmed it out of the front door we were supposed to use. This really didn't work and the actor just disappeared when she went over the white door frame.

Instead we tried it on a different day and using a different door. The sun was still quite bright and we tried different angles - even experimenting with blocking the light with umbrellas and big wooden boards. This didn't help much as the shot is still over exposed and this is a shame as its quite noticeable in our final opening and brings it's quality down slightly but we did all we could have done without cutting out the shot.



Emily Wallace

Monday, 18 April 2011

Final Film Title Ideas and Justification

After receiving feedback on our 2nd rough cut with the use of our alternative title sequence, we began to reconsider our generic challenge. The feedback we received was from Year 10's, Year 11's and Year 13's.
One piece of feedback that we recieved from a Year 13 student was that the titles appearing at the end of the opening resembled a TV show as opposed to a film opening sequence. This brought to our attention that this may affect the continuity of our opening and how our piece is interpreted by our audience and the examiner.
Another piece of feedback we recieved was from a Year 10 student who claimed that they did not understand the storyline or plot. This led us to the conclusion that the title did not appear in the right place, preventing the audience fropm seeing a connection between the female protagonist (Stacey Munez) and the film title (About A Girl). This prevented our audience from understanding the storyline of the film and the importance of the character Stacey.
In order to resolve this problem, we changed the order of our title sequence back to how we originally planned, and placed the title after the character Stacey is first introduced.
This feedback was useful as it allowed us to improve our opening based on other peoples' opinions and ideas and pick up on flaws that we as a group did not consider to be an issue. We are glad we made this decision as we agree with our feedback and find that the improved title sequence resembles a film opening more clearly and gives our audience more insight into the storyline of the film. We are also glad we made this change to our final cut as the risk of representing a trailer or TV show is no longer a problem and the continuity of our opening is more consistent.

Devon Dalton

Sunday, 10 April 2011

Feedback of Rough Cut 2

We asked a range of young adults and teenagers what they thought of our film opening. Here is some of the feedback we received.


We asked 27 people from a year 10 class what they thought of our opening. This means the audience was 14 to 15 years old. This was good as our target audience varied from 15 upwards. The class was mixed gender and this was the results of their feedback:


- They laughed at the sound cutting out for the character Stuart. This is good as within the first few minutes the atmosphere for our film is set and the genre is quickly apparent.
- They didn't understand the story or plot. This led to the discussion of when the title should appear and ultimately changed its position.
- They liked the character Stuart because he was so boring.
- The music set ambiance. Once again this is good as it created the right atmosphere.
- They loved the split screen and said it worked very well.
- 27/27 said they would watch this film.


We then asked 25 people from a year 11 class what they thought of our opening. This means the audience was 15 to 16 years old. This was good as our target audience varied from 15 upwards. The class was mixed gender and this was the results of their feedback:


- They laughed at 'Wisecrack' logo. This was good as it shows our institution has knowledge of the comedy film industry.
- They also laughed at Stuart's silence. This was good as both classes already have awareness that the character Stuart is boring and dull.
- It reminded them of the 'Inbetweeners' (a teen/young adult show about a group of four teenage boys and their adventures). This was good as our film can be compared to a hugely successful show.
- 25/25 said they would watch this film.


Finally, we asked a year 13 media studies group what they thought of our opening. This means the audience was 17 to 18 years old and the fact we asked a media group benefited us as they are aware of media terminology and good openings. The class was mixed gender and this was the results of their feedback:


- Good font for the titles and fitted with the genre.
- Alarm clock also fitted with the genre.
- The fact the alarm clock was green fits with 'Emerald productions'
- The music cutting out for Stuart seemed like an amateur element. They suggested we added in a record scratching when the music cuts so it seems like the music broke; an idea we intend to adopt.
- They said it resembled a TV show, not a film, because of the title appearing at the end. This was also why the year 10 class got confused with the plot. As a result the title 'About a girl' will appear after Stacey is introduced to connote she is the 'girl' from the title.
- All the students said they would want to watch this film and all also said they wanted to watch the opening twice.


Scott Collins

Monday, 4 April 2011

Film Title Research and 2nd Rough Cut Ideas

To challenge generic conventions, we decided during the editing of our 2nd rough cut to change the order of the title sequence. Instead of our film title appearing at the beginning of the opening, we've chosen to display the title at the end of the opening.

This idea was inspired by the film Step Brothers (2008), where the film title does not appear until the very end of the opening scene.


Although film openings are not generally associated with this title format, the sequence works successfully in this example as the opening uses clear generic conventions and contains content that prevents the audience from interpreting the opening as a trailer, such as the storyline and introduction of characters.

For our film opening, we also plan to challenge this generic convention by using it in our piece. We believe that by using the same techniques, our film could also pull off this convention. We also believe it would benefit our piece as it would make it unique and original.

Devon Dalton

Friday, 11 March 2011

Film Diary

DAY ONE

STACEY
Shot one
We started filming by getting the shot of Stacey in the bed to do this we set up the camera to make sure the bed was in the frame and Stacey face could be seen.
We started filming but soon realised that it wouldnt work without timing it correctly so instead we set the alarm and counted it down would be better. You can hear the counting in some of the clips, this way all film-makers knew what to do as well as actors.

Shot two
This was a shot of Stacey straightening her hair. we filmed this first and got about 6 seconds of footage. We then filmed her brushing it this was also about 6seconds. This worked well but wanted it to flow smoothly so we recorded them together for about 15seconds and this enabled us to cut it in editing.


Shot three
This was a new scene as we did not prepare for it. while filming we realised that Stacey is in her pyjamas then she is suddenly in her daily clothes. this is a continuity problem, so we added an extra shot of her pulling her t shirt down, this worked for male gaze theory as well.

Shot four
tissue scene, changed the angle from the original plan
was going to be from the side, stuffing in but changed it to all one shot, pulling down top, then stuffing bra.
acting was really good and she didn't mean prompting, looked really natural.

Shot Five
Changed angle again, but worked out better as it showed more varied angles. instead of filing her looking into the mirror putting on make up, pretend the camera was the mirror as she put it on looking towards us. This is considered as a point of view shot,
Shot Six
had to change sides because of lighting, was to dark in one corner of the room while she was reading so we wanted to change it so she was reading on her bed, taking advantage of the natural sunlight from the window.


STUART
Shot One
We set up the camera several feet higher than Stuart so the audience could see within the frame the book connoting he is the nerdy geek. We had to have the camera's tripod balance on a table and a sofa to get the higher shot we desired what took some time.

Shot Two
Stuart is seen impatiently waiting as he sighs and looks at his watch.
We set up the camera to face the character head on, the shot was a mid shot.

Shot Three
Stuart looks through his window
This shot was suppose to be an easy to achieve shot of the character looking through his window connoting he was impatient for the day to begin. However, we did not think of any relection issues from the glass. Through the camera's eye you could not see the character Stuart but instead only the reflectiong of the crew. To solve this problem we ultered the shot so Stuart opens the window and looks out for his two fellow geek friend before once again closing it.

Shot Four
Stuart is seen walking through his door. This was an easy shot to achive but it started to rain whilst we were filming and therefore we had to have to people filming so that a umbrella could be used to stop the camera getting damaged.


BOB
Shot One
Originaly we wanted the character Bob to be sitting on a chair leaning on his keyboard asleep. However, due to the change of locations we now have the character Bob sitting on his bed asleep upon the keyboard. This wasnt a big deal as the shot still looked good. We had to position the camera perfectly so when Bob stood up and exited the frame the shot didnt blur.

Shot Two
Bob is seen tucking his shirt in. We wanted the shirt to appear tight on Bob connoting little pride in appearnce. To do this a member of our film crew stood behind Bob pulling his shirt back making it appear tight.

Shot Three
To stay true to stereotypical geeks we wanted one character to have ashma. This character should be the one that appears the most un healthy. This was Bob so we have a shot of him using his inhaler connoting through an enigma code Bob is unhealthy.

Shot Four
The actor Bob decided to check himself out before the shot was filmed of him putting on his glasses. However, we left the camera rolling and thought the shot of him checking himself out before putting on his glasses was worthy to be placed in our opening.

Shot Five
Whilse filming Bob leave his front door we had to be coucious. This was due to the fact that if we went to far back we had other doors within the shot; something we did not intend to include. Also the path way the tripod was placed upon was uneven, making it diffucult to get a shot perfectly balanced. As a result it took several minutes to find the perfect angle that wouldnt capture other doors within the frame and would also keep the frame evenly angled.

DAY TWO

BOYS WALKING
Due to the actors only being able to film after school and the fret of the sunlight fading quickly we filmed this shot first, though it is the last to appear in the opening. This also saved the actors Bob and Stu time as they did not have to watch the filming of Tom's scenes first.

TOMS
Shot one
The shot of filming the character Tom watching the femernine show lose women required the moving of furniture. The sofa the actor, Harry, sat on was against the wall. We needed to push it forward so the camera crew could be centred behind him and capture the over the shoulder shot required. We also filmed this shot from the front to see if it would look better or suit the opening more correctly. It did not and was quickly scrapped from consideration of our final edit.



Shot Two
The gloves the character wears had to be done first, so that it was easy for continuity as he could keep them on throughout filming and didnt have to worry about them being on and off.

Shot Three
The batman belt given to the actor was to small to fit. As a result we didnt expect him to wear it so we ultered the shot so the audience could just see he was putting it on (but it was never actually fitted).

Shot four
This was a shot of Tom putting on his white socks, we had to try it at least thre different ways including sitting on the bed, stand up and putting it on and using the chair to lean on. We tried the chair first but it moved very easily but we also tried to film it while someone was holding the chair down out of shot. This still didnt work so we tried him standing up but the actor found this hard to do. We then had him sit on the bed and put his sock on there. The bed worked well because of the white on black contrast.
DAY THREE

Shot five
This day we had forgotten to film Harry coming out of his front door. This was our own fault as it was planned to be done but our group got excited about finishing everything and didnt think about the last shot. This had to be done another time although this was easy to re film as someone in our group lived close to the actor and it was able to be filmed after school one day.
Problems faced with the shot was that the door was less than a meter away from the neighbouring one. There
was no way of avoiding it from our frame, it appeard within the shot slightly. To be as polite and thoughtful as possible and to insure the shot looked better we avoided as much as possible of the neighbouring door.